QuikRead go CRP outperformed other CRP point of care tests in an analytical performance study
A recent study published in Plos One compared the analytical performance of 17 C-reactive protein (CRP) point of care (POC) tests, with 8 being quantitative and 9 being semi-quantitative tests. For quantitative CRP tests, method comparison to the reference method and precision analysis (repeatability) according to CLSI EP09-A3 protocol were performed. Samples were collected from patients aged 2-65 years presenting with fever. The measurement range covered the CRP range relevant to guide antibiotic prescribing and triage patients.
QuikRead go® CRP POC test had the best agreement and lowest bias of all evaluated quantitative CRP tests. The repeatability of QuikRead go in the precision analysis was also good (CV 5.3%). Semi-quantitative tests showed considerable variation in analytical performance. The authors concluded that all quantitative tests performed well in the broad clinically relevant CRP range, whereas none of the semi-quantitative tests were acceptable for all cut-offs.
![QuikRead go CRP](https://paltry-paradoxure.transforms.svdcdn.com/production/general/Images/News/CRP-LTF.jpg?w=1200&h=628&q=90&auto=format&fit=crop&dm=1676445596&s=6157b22ae97cb5447f08a8590b6c97b2)
The full article is freely available here:
Analytical performance of 17 commercially available point-of-care tests for CRP to support patient management at lower levels of the health system
View more information about QuikRead go CRP from its product site.
Reference:
Calarco et al. Analytical performance of 17 commercially available point-of-care tests for CRP to support patient management at lower levels of the health system. Plos One 2023; 18(1): e0267516. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267516